Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sports, Nikon F (Nikon F, full size)
CHF1684.25

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sports, Nikon F

Nikon F, full size


Questions about Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sports, Nikon F

What would you like to know?

Avatar

0 questions and answers

avatar
abledog6

2 years ago

avatar
Anonymous

2 years ago

Helpful answer
Digitec obtains some of the Sigma lenses from a grey dealer and then logically there is no card from the official importer. My own experience. This is not declared in the shop.
avatar
roberToB

5 years ago

avatar
Anonymous

5 years ago

Helpful answer
For other products, there is also no warranty card shown. The Sigma lenses in the Swiss shops, including here, come via Ott and Wyss. They still came with an SSC warranty card.
avatar
jean-pierrejud

5 years ago

avatar
rravelli

5 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
Hello, Yes, I myself bought the TC-2001 and its little brother, the TC-1401 (1.4x) and they work very well with this zoom. However, contrary to what is noted in the description, it is not compatible with the "C" versions of sigma lenses. I also have a zoom lens from this series and it cannot be shown on the TC-2001 and 1401.
avatar
virus109

5 years ago

avatar
Former employee

5 years ago

Helpful answer
According to the manufacturer's information and the forums, this lens should be suitable for use with an FTZ adapter. However, you may have problems getting the autofocus to work.
avatar
Former user

8 years ago

avatar
RomanWueest

8 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
It's a good lens, quite heavy and well made. I use it again and again on a full-frame camera. The focus is not always the fastest. Of course this lens fits the D40x, and the focus should work as far as I know (it's a normal electronic focus, not one with the screw). However, the focal length range on a crop camera is then 105-300mm. I would definitely recommend this lens, especially if you are thinking of moving to a full frame Nikon later on. If not, there are probably cheaper lenses that can image well with your 10 MP.
avatar
ba.baebi

9 years ago

avatar
RomanWueest

9 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
No one. It depends on what you want to photograph and what you value. Does it always have to be sharp down to the last pixel? (Nikon is sharper than Sigma at open aperture). Or is it simply the price that matters to you? Then the Sigma is a good choice, which I have already used for various portraits and also for a football match. Which Nikon are you talking about? The old 70-200 without VR or the new one with VR? The optical stabilisation on the Sigma hasn't always worked well for me and I've never tested that on the Nikons. Sigma (and others) make very good lenses, sometimes better than the comparable Nikons. But what exactly is "better" is usually in the eye of the beholder.

18 of 18 questions

To Top