Questions about Petzl Swift RL

Because it was made in the past ;) and USB-C would take more space.

The battery is included. +cable for charging.

I can't give an exact duration, but here's a little experience report: fully charged once and since then used four times for 10k night jogging (approx. 1 hour each time). Battery is still over 50% full.

Yes, USB-C, here is the source: https://m.petzl.com/DE/de/Sport/Stirnlampen/SWIFT-RL

All Petzl Swift RL (1100 lm) headlamps, regardless of colour, have a red light. The red light can be used as a continuous light or flashing light to maintain the eye's dark adaptation and to be visible in an emergency.

Unfortunately, the system does not allow us to provide 2 guarantees. Therefore, the shorter period has been recorded. However, in the event of problems with the lamp, the guarantee can be registered directly with the manufacturer for the following 3 years.

The Petzl Swift RL device is now supplied with a USB-C port, no longer with micro-USB. The 2350 mAh lithium-ion battery is charged via the USB-C port.

Yes, the Petzl Swift RL headlamp is equipped with a USB-C port that can be used to charge the lithium-ion battery (2350 mAh). This also applies to orders that you place now.

That is correct, there is a USB-C port.

Thank you for your enquiry, I can't answer this question. Is there no information about this on the Petzl website?

Something has actually gone wrong here, because the white glasses are actually sold here with 1100 lumens. The light duration is specified by the supplier as follows: maximum burn time (100 lumens, 35 metres, up to 50 hours), standard (350 lumens, 75 metres, up to 40 hours), maximum (1100 lumens, 154 metres, up to 30 hours). Standard lighting levels: maximum burn time (10 lumens, 12 metres, up to 100 hours), standard (180 lumens, 50 metres, up to 6 hours), maximum (700 lumens, 115 metres, up to 2 hours), continuous red light (3 lumens, 5 metres, 60 hours), flashing red light visible from 150 metres for 300 hours. This means that each colour can be used for a maximum of 2 hours at maximum output, but for considerably longer at lower output. Thank you for pointing this out, we will have the errors rectified here.

We do not have the original charging cable in our range, you can use any micro USB cable, for example this article https://www.galaxus.ch/de/s1/product/gembird-usb-a-micro-usb-b-050-m-usb-20-usb-kabel-14196663.

Hi, I have no problems with the headband and haven't had to research replacements yet.

This product is indeed the white version. Thank you very much for pointing this out. We will be happy to pass this on internally to the relevant department and hope that this will be corrected promptly.

No she has not

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We were able to adjust the guarantee period accordingly.

No, you can't, it has a built-in battery.

There are two times three levels. Weak Medium Strong. For Adaptive and Manual. (However, manual does not mean that the intensity can be adjusted by slider or software). I actually only ever need Adaptive Weak for jogging, sometimes Adaptive Strong for hiking/night skiing.

It is currently at 91.50 :)

there are clips/hooks so that the headband does not slip off the helmet. however, the lamp already holds very well on the helmet. the clips have to be glued to the helmet.

I bought the lamp for the winter race. It is really extremely bright and very light in proportion. I only ever need the lamp at maximum brightness and the battery only lasts for just over 2 hours. At the lower levels, the battery lasts much longer.

It just depends on the level at which you have the weakest level and good conditions, so you'll get there with 50 hours. At least for me. But if you use brighter levels, it will be less. On the brightest level with RL, I'm done after about 3 hours. But you don't really need this level.

According to the manufacturer, the Petzl Swift REACTIVE LIGHTING® should light up for 2.5 hours at maximum power.

Yes, according to our information, a lithium-ion battery 2350mAh is present.

It has now been corrected in the meantime so that everyone now has the same selling price.

This is probably an error as the article has just been included. I have forwarded it for checking.