Product test

Crucial P5: The SSD for gamers

Kevin Hofer
17.7.2020
Translation: machine translated

With the P5, Crucial launches its first SSD that approaches the performance limits of four PCI Express 3.0 lanes. PCIe 3.0? Exactly, Crucial is still using the old standard.

PCIe 4.0 was introduced for the desktop in 2019 with the Ryzen 3000 series. Nevertheless, Crucial is still relying on PCIe 3.0 in 2020. One reason for this is probably that the manufacturer only jumped on the NVMe SSD bandwagon in October 2018 and is therefore simply not yet at that stage of development. Crucial itself says that the market for PCIe 4.0 is still too small.

The P5

Micron triple-level cell (TLC) memory chips and a self-developed controller with hardware encryption are used. The high write speed applies to a dynamic pseudo-SLC cache, which only writes one bit per cell instead of three.

The P5 SSDs come with a five-year manufacturer's warranty. The average operating time (Mean Time To Failure, MTTF) is 1.8 million hours. Depending on the capacity, Crucial specifies a service life of 150 to 1200 terabytes written (TBW).

In terms of IOPS - Input/Output Operations Per Second - Crucial specifies 390,000 for the 1 TB model at 4 KB random read and 500,000 at 4 KB random write.

Crucial offers the Storage Executive software for the P5. This can be used to monitor the SSD, download the latest firmware, customise the encryption and activate the Momentum Cache function. This is a software driver that dynamically utilises unused system resources to improve the burst performance of the SSD. I only activate this function for a comparison in the ATTO Disk Benchmark and Anvil's Storage Utilities. Otherwise, I leave the function deactivated.

If you want to know more about how SSDs work, I recommend the following article.

Test method and set-up

To monitor the temperature of the SSDs, I use CristalDisk Info. The tool also gives me information on the health of the drives, the interface and the transfer mode. If you are interested in the influence of temperature on the speed of an SSD, I recommend the following article.

The ATTO Disk Benchmark uses uncompressed data. It tests the read and write performance of various transfer sizes from 512 B to 64 MB. The read and write performance data of many manufacturers is based on this test methodology: it delivers better results as raw data can be read and written quickly. In everyday life, however, SSDs also have to deal with compressed data, which is why I run additional benchmarks.

The benchmark from Anvil's Storage Utilities not only shows the read and write speeds, but also information on IOPS and response times. I can also determine the proportion of compressed and uncompressed data in the benchmark. I set the proportion of compressed data to 46 per cent. I leave the remaining settings at default.

The PCMark 8 storage benchmark is based on an actual scenario. The PCMark 8 storage test simulates work steps of various applications from the Adobe Creative Suite, Microsoft Office and games. It records the storage activity and generates a benchmark score based on the stored hard drive activity.

In addition to the three benchmarks, I measure the loading time for "Final Fantasy XV", "Rise of the Tomb Raider" and "Resident Evil 2 Remake". Last but not least, I install "CS: GO" and see how long the installation takes.

I run the test on our DimasTech Easy V3.0 benchtable with the following components:

I run the tests three times each and take the best result. I use the WD Black SN750, which I have already tested and which is also based on PCIe 3.0, as a comparison value.

ATTO Disk Benchmark

The P5 only develops its full read and write speed from a file size of around 512 KB. The write rate is around 2.8 GB/s and the read rate is 3 GB/s. I did not achieve the 3 GB/s or 3.4 GB/s promised by the manufacturer in the benchmark. Compared to the SN750, the P5 lags behind by 0.26 GB/s when reading with a file size of 64 MB. Both are on a par when writing.

Once I have activated the momentum cache function, the P5 reaches up to 10.75 GB/s. With a file size of 64 MB, that's 6.44 GB/s for reading and 6.64 GB/s for writing. More than twice as much as with the momentum cache function deactivated.

Anvil Storage Utilities

In the Anvil Storage Utilities benchmark, the P5 is ahead of the SN750 in terms of read performance due to the shorter response times and the P5 is also ahead in terms of IOPS. The opposite is true for writing, where the SN750 is ahead due to the shorter response times and more IOPS. In the overall score, the P5 only has an advantage of 0.8 per cent.

With the Momentum Cache function activated, there is almost 63 per cent more performance. The function is particularly helpful for write tests.

PCMark 8

Load times for games

In the benchmarks, the difference between the SSDs is not great. This changes with the loading times of the games. Here, the P5 leaves the SN750 far behind in two games.

Conclusion: Particularly interesting for gamers

In the synthetic benchmarks, the P5 doesn't differ much from the competition from Western Digital. At least as long as the Momentum Cache function is deactivated. As soon as you enable it, the P5 pulverises the SN750 in the ATTO Disk Benchmark and Anvil's Storage Utilities.

The P5 is particularly impressive when it comes to game loading times. Here it is up to twice as fast as the SN750, which makes a difference in games with long loading times such as "Final Fantasy XV". However, the SSD slows down when writing large amounts of data. This can be seen not only when installing "CS: GO", but also when copying the two films.

The SSD is therefore particularly suitable for gamers who want fast loading times and employees who work with smaller amounts of data, under 10 GB. With a launch price of 211 francs, the SSD is priced in line with the SN750, which costs 206 francs. Crucial's advantage: the company offers full speed from a capacity of 500 GB. With competitors WD and Samsung, this is only the case from 1 TB. If 500 GB of storage capacity is enough for you, the P5 is a good deal.

It's a shame that Crucial still relies on PCIe 3.0. Hopefully the company will soon take the step to PCIe 4.0. <p

17 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

From big data to big brother, Cyborgs to Sci-Fi. All aspects of technology and society fascinate me.


Gaming
Follow topics and stay updated on your areas of interest

Product test

Our experts test products and their applications. Independently and neutrally.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

  • Product test

    Kingston Fury Renegade G5 review: it’s tight at the top

    by Kevin Hofer

  • Product test

    Crucial can’t reclaim the crown with the T710

    by Kevin Hofer

  • Product test

    Review: meet the WD Black SN8100, the new queen of SSDs

    by Kevin Hofer