Is it worth taking out insurance for just under 37.- (2 years) and paying 50.- if the display breaks? In total, this is an additional 87.- (almost 26% aurprice) on top of the 329.- for the Galaxy Watch Active 2.

Question

Accepted Answer

I wouldn't do that. They don't break and the display doesn't break on the watch either. So it's unnecessary and far too expensive.
If you lose it or it gets stolen, you might still have household insurance with simple theft from outside. (This costs about the same)

Search

Question about Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2

Is it worth taking out insurance for just under 37.- (2 years) and paying 50.- if the display breaks? In total, this is an additional 87.- (almost 26% aurprice) on top of the 329.- for the Galaxy Watch Active 2.