It depends on what you have in mind. There is no general better or worse. What you can say in general, however, is that if you work a lot with sequential reading and writing (compression/decompression, for example), then more Mhz would be better, for random access lower latencies would be better (gaming). But only up to a certain point, because the actual latency is formed from CAS and Mhz.
In this case, even the 6400s would be better in both, though not noticeably for you most likely: CAS Latency CL 32 (corresponds to ~10.00ns) Row-to-Column Delay tRCD 39 (corresponds to ~12.19ns) Row Precharge Time tRP 39 (corresponds to ~12.19ns) Active-to-Precharge Time tRAS 102 (corresponds to ~31.88ns)
vs. the 6000 CL30: CAS Latency CL 30 (corresponds to ~10.00ns) Row-to-Column Delay tRCD 38 (corresponds to ~12.67ns) Row Precharge Time tRP 38 (corresponds to ~12.67ns) Active-to-Precharge Time tRAS 96 (corresponds to ~32.00ns)