

EU agrees on new rules for the Internet

In the future, there will be a kind of NetzDG at EU level as well. However, the regulations for the Digital Services Act (DSA) are significantly more comprehensive.
This is an article from our content partner "Golem". Here you can find the original article by the author Friedhelm Greis.
Mixture of e-commerce directive and NetzDG
The DSA is a kind of mixture of the previous e-commerce directive and the German Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG). The planned regulation perpetuates important principles of the Internet economy. These include the so-called liability privilege for host providers, the country of origin principle and the prohibition of a general monitoring obligation. It also regulates the handling of illegal content and the obligations of major Internet platforms.
Personalized advertising will be restricted
No verification requirement for porn uploaders
According to Schirdewan, the DSA opens "the black box of the algorithms of online platforms" through far-reaching transparency obligations.
The negotiating parties also agreed that the large IT corporations will have to pay a supervision fee in the future. This is intended to finance the enforcement of the regulation by supervisory authorities.
In addition, a passage on so-called dark patterns was included in the DSA. Such "dark patterns" are intended to induce users to give unwanted consent or to conclude contracts. However, member states "under administrative pretexts" ended up severely limiting the scope of the proposal, Schirdewan said.
The MEP also regretted that an exemption rule for medium-sized companies had been integrated. "This is a mistake. Due to the numerous companies that fall under this definition in the digital sector, the exception resembles a loophole," Schirdewan criticized.
Also deleted was a demand by the European Parliament that providers of porn portals in the EU be required to verify user uploads. New deletion obligations for search engines, which had been discussed recently, were also not included in the DSA.
Breyer: No basic law for the Internet
In Breyer's view, the DSA does not deserve to be called a "digital basic law." "Our privacy on the net is not protected by a right to anonymous Internet use, nor by a right to encryption, a ban on data retention, or a right to reject surveillance advertising in the browser (Do not track). (...) Industry and government interests have unfortunately prevailed over digital civil rights," said the civil rights activist.
Titelbild: Shutterstock

We not only write about IT, technology and science, we are also enthusiastic about them. We like to touch technology, try it out, play with it and explain it with journalistic ambition. Expert knowledge in our subject areas helps us to classify what we see and to maintain a critical distance. With curiosity, we investigate facts, check them out and always look beyond the edge of the monitor. We see ourselves as advocates for our readers, and dialog with them is important to us.Â
From the latest iPhone to the return of 80s fashion. The editorial team will help you make sense of it all.
Show all